talkaboutoutdoors.com Forum Index
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Body of water big enough to row on?
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    talkaboutoutdoors.com Forum Index -> Rowing Sport
Author Message
jnethercutt



Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:03 pm    Post subject: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

I just received my copy of "Essential Sculling" by Boyne in the hopes
I would find the answer to my question - How big is big enough. I
didn't find the answer.

I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
in taking up this sport.

Any information is greatly appreciated.

Archived from group: rec>sport>rowing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ted van de Weteringe



Joined: 09 Dec 2007
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:36 am    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

jnethercutt wrote:
> I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> in taking up this sport.

Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
a racing single.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bookie



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 12, 7:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
wrote:
> jnethercutt wrote:
> > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > in taking up this sport.
>
> Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> a racing single.

mmm...that's a bit short to me, you probably would want something at
least 1500m long, so 6-7 minutes before you have to turn or you will
get very bored indeed,

i always wonder how many lakes and bodies of water there are in the UK
(lakes, reservoirs etc) would be ideal for sculling on but are not
used for that purpose, ie wasted!!! I hate seeing perfectly good
expanses of flat sheltered water inthe countryside which is not being
used for rowing on, just dreadful, why do the locals not utilise their
natural resource and start up rowing clubs? thats the first thing i
would do. maybe they are busy doing things like working for a living
and all that craziness but that's still no excuse. there must be loads
of big lakes in parts of the country which could used for rowing
training without having to think about building man made things like
dorney

had similar experience actually when i popped over to singapore before
christmas (after being assured by some people that there is rowing on
the island of singapore I found no evidence of it whatsoever); Whilst
i was visiting the world renowned Singapore Zoo in the north of the
island I discovered an enormous lake next to the zoo grounds (I don't
think it was actually part of the zoo but i could be wrong), kind of
near the elephant enclosure i think, with absolutely no evidence of
any kind of watersports activity taking place on it whatsoever!!!! it
must have been at least 2km long and it was quite wide and sheltered,
a complete waste! I don't know what the name of the lake was, think it
had a big pagoda type thing at one end, but anyway the whole
possibility of there being this fabulous potential training facility
really bugged me all the way through the rest of the zoo, in the
'rainforest experience', the ben and jerry's cafe afterwards, and on
the bus ride home too.

anyway my cat is yowling at me for some reason, have to find out what
she wants, probably just the back door opening, for some unknown
reason she is covered in dirt so god knows what she has been up to
whilst i was out on the water this arvo, no good i suspect

Bookie
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Alistair Potts



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:37 am    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

"bookie" wrote in message @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> Whilst
> i was visiting the world renowned Singapore Zoo in the north of the
> island I discovered an enormous lake next to the zoo grounds (I don't
> think it was actually part of the zoo but i could be wrong), kind of
> near the elephant enclosure i think, with absolutely no evidence of
> any kind of watersports activity taking place on it whatsoever!!!!

Well duh. It's probably where they keep the hippos.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
david.henderson



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:36 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 12, 8:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
wrote:
> jnethercutt wrote:
> > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > in taking up this sport.
>
> Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> a racing single.

A number of places in the UK only have about 800m, Talkin Tarn,
Hollingworth Lake, Birmingham, hasn't stopped them from producing top-
class crews, at least at a regional level. Used to be a club in the
North East, Ebchester, whose regatta was only 200m, I don't think they
had much more than that to paddle on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jnethercutt



Joined: 12 Feb 2008
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:43 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 12, 3:36 pm, "david.hender...@aea.be"
wrote:
> On Feb 12, 8:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
>
> wrote:
> > jnethercutt wrote:
> > > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > > in taking up this sport.
>
> > Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> > rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> > a racing single.
>
> A number of places in the UK only have about 800m, Talkin Tarn,
> Hollingworth Lake, Birmingham, hasn't stopped them from producing top-
> class crews, at least at a regional level.  Used to be a club in the
> North East, Ebchester, whose regatta was only 200m, I don't think they
> had much more than that to paddle on.

Thanks for the posts. According to Google Earth, my "lake" is 200x500
meters. Might be too small but I'm still optimistic.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Christopher Anton



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 190

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 2:45 am    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

"bookie" wrote in message @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 12, 7:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
wrote:
> jnethercutt wrote:
> > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > in taking up this sport.
>
> Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> a racing single.

mmm...that's a bit short to me, you probably would want something at
least 1500m long, so 6-7 minutes before you have to turn or you will
get very bored indeed,

Well we don't get bored in Birmingham, and have in years past even won a few
Henley medals.

had similar experience actually when i popped over to singapore before
christmas (after being assured by some people that there is rowing on
the island of singapore I found no evidence of it whatsoever); Whilst
i was visiting the world renowned Singapore Zoo in the north of the
island I discovered an enormous lake next to the zoo grounds (I don't
think it was actually part of the zoo but i could be wrong), kind of
near the elephant enclosure i think, with absolutely no evidence of
any kind of watersports activity taking place on it whatsoever!!!! it
must have been at least 2km long and it was quite wide and sheltered,
a complete waste! I don't know what the name of the lake was, think it
had a big pagoda type thing at one end, but anyway the whole
possibility of there being this fabulous potential training facility
really bugged me all the way through the rest of the zoo, in the
'rainforest experience', the ben and jerry's cafe afterwards, and on
the bus ride home too.

sounds like you're talking about Seletar reservoir. Upper Peirce rservoir is
long enough but you couldn't get a course wide enough in without some
serious excavations. Unfortunately Google Earth's got a cloud in exactly the
wrong place. 1.4N 103.8E will take you just about to the potential course.
The pictures people have posted have showed it's quite a pleasant location.
And you may be surprised to know that SIN is a member of FISA and their
website is www.sara.org.sg
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
J Flory



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 39

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

> Thanks for the posts.  According to Google Earth, my "lake" is 200x500
> meters.  Might be too small but I'm still optimistic.
My 2 cents: it really depends on you more than anything else. If
going back and forth over 500m is OK with you, then it will be fine.
One of the guys I race against trains on a 1km stretch and is really
fast, so it works for him.

Personally, I want more room and fortunately I have it on the river
where I train: essentially limitless. There is a 1000x1500m L-shaped
lake nearby (1 lap = ca 5000m) where I row sometimes and I think I
would go crazy on even that if I used it all the time.

Another thought is to use your lake most of the time and go to longer
stretches when you have more time, perhaps on the weekends.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobmcmillen11



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 12, 4:43 pm, jnethercutt wrote:
> On Feb 12, 3:36 pm, "david.hender...@aea.be"
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 8:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
>
> > wrote:
> > > jnethercutt wrote:
> > > > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > > > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > > > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > > > in taking up this sport.
>
> > > Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> > > rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> > > a racing single.
>
> > A number of places in the UK only have about 800m, Talkin Tarn,
> > Hollingworth Lake, Birmingham, hasn't stopped them from producing top-
> > class crews, at least at a regional level. Used to be a club in the
> > North East, Ebchester, whose regatta was only 200m, I don't think they
> > had much more than that to paddle on.
>
> Thanks for the posts. According to Google Earth, my "lake" is 200x500
> meters. Might be too small but I'm still optimistic.

If I had a 500m lake, I would certainly be out there.

You might want to try a slow (recreational) boat, or a racing boat
with resistance. Resistance can easily be added by towing some sort of
drag device. A 3" by 12" section of PVC pipe towed end on, and with a
few 1/2" holes drilled through, works fine.
Resistance can be increased by adding additional sections of pipe.
Cheers,
Bob
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
go-row



Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 9:50 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

Your small lake will be perfect for you to become accustomed to your
boat and learn the basic stroke. And yes, you can zip around the
shoreline, changing direction, etc. But even a several mile long lake
can become overly familiar if you never row elsewhere. You will want
to load your scull on the car and seek out other scullers on other
lakes, rivers, even the ocean. So, by all means, if you're really
interested, do it.

> > > > > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know
the minimum
> > > > > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > > > > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > > > > in taking up this sport.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TidewayUmpire



Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 5:46 am    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 13, 12:50�am, go-row wrote:
> � Your small lake will be perfect for you to become accustomed to your
> boat and learn the basic stroke. And yes, you can zip around the
> shoreline, changing direction, etc. But even a several mile long lake
> can become overly familiar if you never row elsewhere. You will want
> to load your scull on the car and seek out other scullers on other
> lakes, rivers, even the ocean. So, by all means, if you're really
> interested, do it.
>
> �> > > > > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know
> the minimum
>
>
>
> > > > > > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > > > > > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > > > > > in taking up this sport.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Coming in a bit late on this topic, sorry.

From your post it sounds like you are complete beginner at any sort of
rowing?
You dont say how deep the lake is or if it is on private property
[probably] and if it is secluded or not, but it probably is?
You know where I'm going folks Smile

Dont want to put you off in any way, rowing / sculling is by far the
best way to spend your free time & get fit etc., BUT you must always
consider YOUR safety.
Learning to scull, on your own, on a private lake that is probably not
overlooked is VERY dangerous as if you go in and you will you have a
very high probability of not coming home.

Plenty of advice on this group about safety and the hazards of
immersion in water, even 'warm' water, hypothermia and what to do and
not to do.

Search on the forum for 'heel restraints', 'bouyancy', 'straddle &
paddle', read all Carl Douglas's posts or go to www.leoblockley.org.uk

NEVER go out on your lake alone, even if you get to Olympic standard.
I doubt if Sir Steve or Matt Pinsent would & that should be good
enough for anyone.
ALWAYS have someone on the bank at least so they can assist/raise the
alarm if you get into trouble.

Dont just believe what I say, go to any rowing club and ask them, they
will tell you the same & probably get you to join them so they can
teach you sculling & rowing in comparative safety.

The last thing we want is for you to go out one bright morning on your
lake, all fit and keen and ready conquer the world and not come back
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
danielwspring



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 11:44 am    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On 12 Feb, 19:56, bookie wrote:
> On Feb 12, 7:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
>
> wrote:
> > jnethercutt wrote:
> > > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > > in taking up this sport.
>
> > Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> > rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> > a racing single.
>
> mmm...that's a bit short to me, you probably would want something at
> least 1500m long, so 6-7 minutes before you have to turn or you will
> get very bored indeed,
>
> i always wonder how many lakes and bodies of water there are in the UK
> (lakes, reservoirs etc) would be ideal for sculling on but are not
> used for that purpose, ie wasted!!! I hate seeing perfectly good
> expanses of flat sheltered water inthe countryside which is not being
> used for rowing on, just dreadful, why do the locals not utilise their
> natural resource and start up rowing clubs? thats the first thing i
> would do. maybe they are busy doing things like working for a living
> and all that craziness but that's still no excuse. there must be loads
> of big lakes in parts of the country which could used for rowing
> training without having to think about building man made things like
> dorney
>
> had similar experience actually when i popped over to singapore before
> christmas (after being assured by some people that there is rowing on
> the island of singapore I found no evidence of it whatsoever); Whilst
> i was visiting the world renowned Singapore Zoo in the north of the
> island I discovered an enormous lake next to the zoo grounds (I don't
> think it was actually part of the zoo but i could be wrong), kind of
> near the elephant enclosure i think, with absolutely no evidence of
> any kind of watersports activity taking place on it whatsoever!!!! it
> must have been at least 2km long and it was quite wide and sheltered,
> a complete waste! I don't know what the name of the lake was, think it
> had a big pagoda type thing at one end, but anyway the whole
> possibility of there being this fabulous potential training facility
> really bugged me all the way through the rest of the zoo, in the
> 'rainforest experience', the ben and jerry's cafe afterwards, and on
> the bus ride home too.
>
> anyway my cat is yowling at me for some reason, have to find out what
> she wants, probably just the back door opening, for some unknown
> reason she is covered in dirt so god knows what she has been up to
> whilst i was out on the water this arvo, no good i suspect
>
> Bookie

i would agree, there is plenty of water around that doesn't get used.
I remember racing at the Metropolitan Regatta when it was held at
Thorpe Park......why don't we row there anymore ! Lose in the first
round and spend the rest of the day on the rides ! http://www.thorpepark.co.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bookie



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:08 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 12, 8:37 pm, "Alistair Potts"
wrote:
> "bookie" wrote in message
>
> @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Whilst
> > i was visiting the world renowned Singapore Zoo in the north of the
> > island I discovered an enormous lake next to the zoo grounds (I don't
> > think it was actually part of the zoo but i could be wrong), kind of
> > near the elephant enclosure i think, with absolutely no evidence of
> > any kind of watersports activity taking place on it whatsoever!!!!
>
> Well duh. It's probably where they keep the hippos.

i thought it might be too but that was in another lake, anyway fleeing
a maternally enraged hippo might be considered a good training tool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bookie



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 12, 9:45 pm, "Christopher Anton"
wrote:
> "bookie" wrote in message
>
> @s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 12, 7:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
>
> wrote:
> > jnethercutt wrote:
> > > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > > in taking up this sport.
>
> > Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> > rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> > a racing single.
>
> mmm...that's a bit short to me, you probably would want something at
> least 1500m long, so 6-7 minutes before you have to turn or you will
> get very bored indeed,
>
> Well we don't get bored in Birmingham, and have in years past even won a few
> Henley medals.
>
> had similar experience actually when i popped over to singapore before
> christmas (after being assured by some people that there is rowing on
> the island of singapore I found no evidence of it whatsoever); Whilst
> i was visiting the world renowned Singapore Zoo in the north of the
> island I discovered an enormous lake next to the zoo grounds (I don't
> think it was actually part of the zoo but i could be wrong), kind of
> near the elephant enclosure i think, with absolutely no evidence of
> any kind of watersports activity taking place on it whatsoever!!!! it
> must have been at least 2km long and it was quite wide and sheltered,
> a complete waste! I don't know what the name of the lake was, think it
> had a big pagoda type thing at one end, but anyway the whole
> possibility of there being this fabulous potential training facility
> really bugged me all the way through the rest of the zoo, in the
> 'rainforest experience', the ben and jerry's cafe afterwards, and on
> the bus ride home too.
>
> sounds like you're talking about Seletar reservoir. Upper Peirce rservoir is
> long enough but you couldn't get a course wide enough in without some
> serious excavations. Unfortunately Google Earth's got a cloud in exactly the
> wrong place. 1.4N 103.8E will take you just about to the potential course.
> The pictures people have posted have showed it's quite a pleasant location..
> And you may be surprised to know that SIN is a member of FISA and their
> website iswww.sara.org.sg

seletar reservoir rings a bell actually, and i did try to contact the
singapore rowing federation but got no answer, in fact all messages
bounced, so who knows whether they still exist

it is still a waste of a resource, hippos or not
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bookie



Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:12 pm    Post subject: Re: Body of water big enough to row on? Reply with quote

On Feb 13, 2:44 pm, danielwspr...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On 12 Feb, 19:56, bookie wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 7:36 pm, Ted van de Weteringe
>
> > wrote:
> > > jnethercutt wrote:
> > > > I have a small lake on my property and would like to know the minimum
> > > > length (length of the body water) one should have accessible before
> > > > investing in sculling gear and taking lessons. I'm really interested
> > > > in taking up this sport.
>
> > > Well, 750 m is probably doable for semi-serious training: 3-4 minutes
> > > rowing, 20-30 seconds turning. That's for a rather proficient sculler in
> > > a racing single.
>
> > mmm...that's a bit short to me, you probably would want something at
> > least 1500m long, so 6-7 minutes before you have to turn or you will
> > get very bored indeed,
>
> > i always wonder how many lakes and bodies of water there are in the UK
> > (lakes, reservoirs etc) would be ideal for sculling on but are not
> > used for that purpose, ie wasted!!! I hate seeing perfectly good
> > expanses of flat sheltered water inthe countryside which is not being
> > used for rowing on, just dreadful, why do the locals not utilise their
> > natural resource and start up rowing clubs? thats the first thing i
> > would do. maybe they are busy doing things like working for a living
> > and all that craziness but that's still no excuse. there must be loads
> > of big lakes in parts of the country which could used for rowing
> > training without having to think about building man made things like
> > dorney
>
> > had similar experience actually when i popped over to singapore before
> > christmas (after being assured by some people that there is rowing on
> > the island of singapore I found no evidence of it whatsoever); Whilst
> > i was visiting the world renowned Singapore Zoo in the north of the
> > island I discovered an enormous lake next to the zoo grounds (I don't
> > think it was actually part of the zoo but i could be wrong), kind of
> > near the elephant enclosure i think, with absolutely no evidence of
> > any kind of watersports activity taking place on it whatsoever!!!! it
> > must have been at least 2km long and it was quite wide and sheltered,
> > a complete waste! I don't know what the name of the lake was, think it
> > had a big pagoda type thing at one end, but anyway the whole
> > possibility of there being this fabulous potential training facility
> > really bugged me all the way through the rest of the zoo, in the
> > 'rainforest experience', the ben and jerry's cafe afterwards, and on
> > the bus ride home too.
>
> > anyway my cat is yowling at me for some reason, have to find out what
> > she wants, probably just the back door opening, for some unknown
> > reason she is covered in dirt so god knows what she has been up to
> > whilst i was out on the water this arvo, no good i suspect
>
> > Bookie
>
> i would agree, there is plenty of water around that doesn't get used.
> I remember racing at the Metropolitan Regatta when it was held at
> Thorpe Park......why don't we row there anymore ! Lose in the first
> round and spend the rest of the day on the rides !http://www.thorpepark.co..uk/- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

how long is that lake then?

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
New Water Safety Code (UK) Slightly surprised that this hasn't been mentioned on here already, but the ARA are consulting (there's a phrase you don't hear often) on a new Water Safety Code: I haven't had time to look

worst walk from boathouse doors to water what rowing sites have the worst/longest walks to launch a boat? Distance? Obstacles? danger? Los Gatos comes to mind, the lake is low so to launch they walk nearly a hundred yards. Going back is uphill! Mike

minimum water depth for training/racing Our city is dredging a new lake and they have asked us how deep the water needs to be for rowing. I know that technically, the draft is very small for shells, but my intuition is that 3 feet would be a good minimum for both shells and launches. Any less a

Good on C2 = good on water? I've just discovered Concept 2 rowing and have surprised myself by finding that with only ten days of training I am already doing times close to top 10% percentile of times on the C2 website. I just wondered if I might be any good at rowing on water? I wo

Body Surfing What are the paddles worn by some body surfers on their hands to enhance the experience of body surfers? Who in Sydney stocks them? There is no dedicated NG for body surfers. I thought some of you would no here. I body surf every day. I want to buy one
Post new topic   Reply to topic    talkaboutoutdoors.com Forum Index -> Rowing Sport All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group