 |
|
|
|
| Author |
Message |
danielwspring
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:11 am Post subject: Gold medal standard times |
|
|
The Aussies are reported to be targeting 6.00 dead as the GMS time for
the mens 2x, given this is 3 seconds faster than the current worlds
best it seems a stretching target to say the least. Does anyone know
where I can find the GMS that the GB guys are using?
Archived from group: rec>sport>rowing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Teaplant
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:52 pm Post subject: Re: Gold medal standard times |
|
|
On 19 Feb, 09:11, danielwspr...@hotmail.com wrote:
> The Aussies are reported to be targeting 6.00 dead as the GMS time for
> the mens 2x, given this is 3 seconds faster than the current worlds
> best it seems a stretching target to say the least. Does anyone know
> where I can find the GMS that the GB guys are using?
Obviously I have no idea but... I thought that GMS times were really
only pertinent as comparisons between boat types - ie its the
differential between, say, the 2x and 4x GMS times that is important.
Shifting one GMS (the 2x) and leaving the rest unchanged would reflect
that the Aussies consider it to be a tougher event to win than last
time their GMS's were calculated. Hence by stiffening the 2x GMS and
producing lower percentages, for their doubles, they may come to the
conclusion that a particular group of athletes have a better chance of
gold if they combine to make a 4x rather than having a 2x as their top
medal chance.
They may, of course, have shaved them all down a bit to reflect
improving standards worldwide, in which case its sensible, but does
not affect their training/selection procedure other than for
motivational purposes. It doesn't actually matter what GMS is set,
it's not as if you stop training once you reach it and wait for
Beijing....
Do you know if the Aussies have adjusted them all, or do they just
consider the 2x harder to win this time around?
teaplant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
al
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:11 pm Post subject: Re: Gold medal standard times |
|
|
On Feb 20, 2:52 am, Teaplant wrote:
> On 19 Feb, 09:11, danielwspr...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > The Aussies are reported to be targeting 6.00 dead as the GMS time for
> > the mens 2x, given this is 3 seconds faster than the current worlds
> > best it seems a stretching target to say the least. Does anyone know
> > where I can find the GMS that the GB guys are using?
>
> Obviously I have no idea but... I thought that GMS times were really
> only pertinent as comparisons between boat types - ie its the
> differential between, say, the 2x and 4x GMS times that is important.
> Shifting one GMS (the 2x) and leaving the rest unchanged would reflect
> that the Aussies consider it to be a tougher event to win than last
> time their GMS's were calculated. Hence by stiffening the 2x GMS and
> producing lower percentages, for their doubles, they may come to the
> conclusion that a particular group of athletes have a better chance of
> gold if they combine to make a 4x rather than having a 2x as their top
> medal chance.
>
> They may, of course, have shaved them all down a bit to reflect
> improving standards worldwide, in which case its sensible, but does
> not affect their training/selection procedure other than for
> motivational purposes. It doesn't actually matter what GMS is set,
> it's not as if you stop training once you reach it and wait for
> Beijing....
>
> Do you know if the Aussies have adjusted them all, or do they just
> consider the 2x harder to win this time around?
>
> teaplant.
All the times for GMS are stretch goals. The GMS for the 1x is 6:31,
for example. Basically, if I recall correctly, there was an analysis
of times done over the last few years and a projection made of what
would be required to win the next Olympics given perfect conditions.
We do (or I did until I got cut) a weekly session of step rates that
are compared against the GMS, so we can get an idea of progression and
speeds throughout the season.
And for a real stretch goal: the 2- has set a pie-in-the-sky goal of
6:00. I don't know that they really think it can be done, but it
provides a frame of reference for an ultimate performance, and for
them to examine technique, training, boats, and the mental approach as
to how an ulitmate performance can be achieved.
At the moment, it appears to be: loads of k's on the bike, smash
ergos, and then row the pair a few times a month.
Re: the prioritisation of 2x and 4x. The 2x is definitely the
priority men's sculling boat, and it seems that the double from last
year will be selected for this year. I do hope they are. They were
close last year, and just need to take a step onwards.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Related Topics: | Oar Blade colours Black and gold chevrons Hi Would anyone know the rowing club that has black and gold chevrons as their oar colours.Lower chevron black,middle chevron gold,top chevron black.The black chevrons are the same size while the gold middle chevron is approx double the thickness of the b
All work and no play slows China's Olympians - the Times This is really fascinating.
The snow by way of the handsome sink is the medal that menti after the wild stem on which they are grafted. If what I say does not serve to enlighten you, it will be of use to the people. If these are silent, the stones will speak. Silence is the greatest persecution; the saints were never silent. It is true that a
Shred Ready Standard Helmet Is this a new product? I just saw it advertised in AWA magazine. The Shred Ready Standard Helmet comes with removeable earpiece for $70 or with removeable facemask for $100. Weight of helmet(s) is not stated on the website. Hopefully it's
Cand standard #2 fuel dock diesel be greener than "bio"? Can Standard #2 Diesel be "Greener" than Biofuels? According to studies performed at the University of California, Berkley Combustion Analysis Laboratory, that standard #2 might be a more friendly choice than commonly believed. The Univers |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|